New International Law Textbook Discusses Lunar Real Estate

A new international law textbook contains an article on “Space Settlements, Property Rights, and International Law: Could a Lunar Settlement Claim the Lunar Real Estate it Needs to Survive?” by Alan Wasser and Douglas Jobes. Wasser, a former CEO of the National Space Society, argues in favor of “Land Claims Recognition” to help fund lunar settlements.

If and when the Moon and Mars are settled in the future through other incentives, the nations of Earth will eventually have to recognize these settlements’ authority over their own land. But to create an incentive now, governments would need to commit to recognizing that ownership in advance, rather than long after the fact.

Land claims recognition legislation would commit the Earth’s nations, in advance, to allowing a true private Lunar settlement to claim and sell (to people back on Earth) a reasonable amount of Lunar real estate in the area around the base, thus giving the founders of the Moon settlement a way to earn back the investment they made to establish the settlement.

The 42-page article was originally published in the Journal of Air Law and Commerce, Vol. 73, No. 1, 2008. The full article in PDF format is available on the NSS website as part of the NSS Lunar Bases and Settlement Library (“Additional Papers” section).

The textbook, International Law: Contemporary Issues and Future Developments, edited by Sanford R. Silverburg, was published in March 2011 by Westview Press.

This entry was posted in National Space Society, NSS Website Updates, Space Law, Space Policy, Space Settlement. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to New International Law Textbook Discusses Lunar Real Estate

  1. The Moon is legally the property of humankind. So that should mean that lunar property could be leased through the UN with revenues from those leases being equally divided amongst all members of the UN.

    It would probably be better for the UN to lease lunar territory only to individual governments and then allow those governments to sublease portions of their territory to private commercial companies and institutions.

  2. Dave says:

    I agree with Marcel. The property shouldn’t be sold, just leased like they do with Antarctica.

  3. I don’t think Antarctica is a good model because there is no intent to ever settle Antarctica. There are bases there but not settlements. The New World or the American West are better models.

  4. Alan Wasser and Douglas Jobes argues in favor of “Land Claims Recognition” to help fund lunar settlements. They are doing a fantastic job.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>