<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lockheed Martin Reusable Booster System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nss.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nss.org/?p=3180</link>
	<description>Blogging for the creation of a spacefaring civilization</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://blog.nss.org/?p=3180&cpage=1#comment-23264</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 20:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nss.org/?p=3180#comment-23264</guid>
		<description>Hi Bann,

Let's be realistic. NASA can't even fund CCDEV the way it needs to be funded. It is too much in the stranglehold of Congress, which has mandated the development of the expensive and ultimately to be cancelled jobs program called the Senate Launch System (SLS). The Air Force has a much easier time getting done what needs to be done. Congress doesn't micromanage the DOD the way it does NASA. Contrary to your last comment, this is clearly a case where a military project can be easily convertable to a civilian product with great benefit to the civilain economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bann,</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be realistic. NASA can&#8217;t even fund CCDEV the way it needs to be funded. It is too much in the stranglehold of Congress, which has mandated the development of the expensive and ultimately to be cancelled jobs program called the Senate Launch System (SLS). The Air Force has a much easier time getting done what needs to be done. Congress doesn&#8217;t micromanage the DOD the way it does NASA. Contrary to your last comment, this is clearly a case where a military project can be easily convertable to a civilian product with great benefit to the civilain economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bann</title>
		<link>http://blog.nss.org/?p=3180&cpage=1#comment-23106</link>
		<dc:creator>bann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nss.org/?p=3180#comment-23106</guid>
		<description>Is this not just a worrying continuation of the ridiculous excuse to use of the military complex as a means for advancing technology? Why isn't this in NASAs hands rather than the USAF? Doesn't USAF have clearly worrisome priorities? Makes to me little sense, since the cold war has been over for a while. 

While people may think that it's just a means to an end or something in that fashion, it should clearly work in another way and is just opening the potential for more resources getting thrown into useless astronomically expensive military projects with little to no civilian benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this not just a worrying continuation of the ridiculous excuse to use of the military complex as a means for advancing technology? Why isn&#8217;t this in NASAs hands rather than the USAF? Doesn&#8217;t USAF have clearly worrisome priorities? Makes to me little sense, since the cold war has been over for a while. </p>
<p>While people may think that it&#8217;s just a means to an end or something in that fashion, it should clearly work in another way and is just opening the potential for more resources getting thrown into useless astronomically expensive military projects with little to no civilian benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
