<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New International Law Textbook Discusses Lunar Real Estate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nss.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nss.org/?p=2585</link>
	<description>Blogging for the creation of a spacefaring civilization</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: property managers Maribyrnong</title>
		<link>http://blog.nss.org/?p=2585&cpage=1#comment-31871</link>
		<dc:creator>property managers Maribyrnong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 06:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nss.org/?p=2585#comment-31871</guid>
		<description>Alan Wasser and Douglas Jobes argues in favor of “Land Claims Recognition” to help fund lunar settlements. They are doing a fantastic job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan Wasser and Douglas Jobes argues in favor of “Land Claims Recognition” to help fund lunar settlements. They are doing a fantastic job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Brandt-Erichsen</title>
		<link>http://blog.nss.org/?p=2585&cpage=1#comment-16468</link>
		<dc:creator>David Brandt-Erichsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 00:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nss.org/?p=2585#comment-16468</guid>
		<description>I don't think Antarctica is a good model because there is no intent to ever settle Antarctica. There are bases there but not settlements. The New World or the American West are better models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Antarctica is a good model because there is no intent to ever settle Antarctica. There are bases there but not settlements. The New World or the American West are better models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.nss.org/?p=2585&cpage=1#comment-15867</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nss.org/?p=2585#comment-15867</guid>
		<description>I agree with Marcel. The property shouldn't be sold, just leased like they do with Antarctica.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Marcel. The property shouldn&#8217;t be sold, just leased like they do with Antarctica.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcel F. Williams</title>
		<link>http://blog.nss.org/?p=2585&cpage=1#comment-12126</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel F. Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 01:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nss.org/?p=2585#comment-12126</guid>
		<description>The Moon is legally  the property of humankind. So that should mean that lunar property could be leased through the UN with revenues from those leases being equally divided amongst all members of the UN. 

 It would probably be better for the UN to lease lunar territory only to individual governments and then allow those governments to  sublease portions of their territory to private commercial companies and institutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Moon is legally  the property of humankind. So that should mean that lunar property could be leased through the UN with revenues from those leases being equally divided amongst all members of the UN. </p>
<p> It would probably be better for the UN to lease lunar territory only to individual governments and then allow those governments to  sublease portions of their territory to private commercial companies and institutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
