<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pintle Injector Rocket Engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nss.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nss.org/?p=1900</link>
	<description>Blogging for the creation of a spacefaring civilization</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martha Adams</title>
		<link>http://blog.nss.org/?p=1900&cpage=1#comment-6433</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 03:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nss.org/?p=1900#comment-6433</guid>
		<description>When I looked at the description of the pintle injector, I saw a thing so simple and effective I had to think a little for it to sink in.  I fetched a copy of the TRW paper, very interesting reading.  This shows large powerful machines can be simple, the developmental end point you are always trying for.  Too bad we can't do a spacesuit like that -- or can we, somehow?  

How is the noise spectrum from these pintle engines different from that of earlier varieties?  I've an intuitive feeling the sound is very different, markedly lower amplitude in the higher frequencies.  And I'd look for the pintle engine to be less vulnerable to longitudinal ship oscillation.

Titeotwawki -- Martha Adams   [2010 Sep 05]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I looked at the description of the pintle injector, I saw a thing so simple and effective I had to think a little for it to sink in.  I fetched a copy of the TRW paper, very interesting reading.  This shows large powerful machines can be simple, the developmental end point you are always trying for.  Too bad we can&#8217;t do a spacesuit like that &#8212; or can we, somehow?  </p>
<p>How is the noise spectrum from these pintle engines different from that of earlier varieties?  I&#8217;ve an intuitive feeling the sound is very different, markedly lower amplitude in the higher frequencies.  And I&#8217;d look for the pintle engine to be less vulnerable to longitudinal ship oscillation.</p>
<p>Titeotwawki &#8212; Martha Adams   [2010 Sep 05]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martijn Meijering</title>
		<link>http://blog.nss.org/?p=1900&cpage=1#comment-6025</link>
		<dc:creator>Martijn Meijering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 22:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nss.org/?p=1900#comment-6025</guid>
		<description>There's a great TRW paper about pintle injectors at the following URL:

http://smartdata.usbid.com/datasheets/usbid/2001/2001-q1/pintleenginepaperaiaafinal.pdf
TRW Pintle Engine Heritage and Performance Characteristics

It includes some great pictures of water flowing through the injector (outer flow only, innerflow only, combined flow), illustrating the principle very nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a great TRW paper about pintle injectors at the following URL:</p>
<p><a href="http://smartdata.usbid.com/datasheets/usbid/2001/2001-q1/pintleenginepaperaiaafinal.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://smartdata.usbid.com/datasheets/usbid/2001/2001-q1/pintleenginepaperaiaafinal.pdf</a><br />
TRW Pintle Engine Heritage and Performance Characteristics</p>
<p>It includes some great pictures of water flowing through the injector (outer flow only, innerflow only, combined flow), illustrating the principle very nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
